<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for IPLJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iplj.net/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iplj.net/blog</link>
	<description>Fordham Intellectual Property, Media &#38; Entertainment Law Journal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gamers Love Virtual War by Chopoff Consulting Blog &#187; 2012 &#187; February &#187; 02</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/3550/comment-page-1#comment-59895</link>
		<dc:creator>Chopoff Consulting Blog &#187; 2012 &#187; February &#187; 02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=3550#comment-59895</guid>
		<description>[...] is our nature to do war. That is why in our supposed non-violent society there is an overwhelming love of war games. More so than any other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is our nature to do war. That is why in our supposed non-violent society there is an overwhelming love of war games. More so than any other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New Look by Emily</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/2676/comment-page-1#comment-59894</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=2676#comment-59894</guid>
		<description>Love the new look of the blog!  Keep up the good work, Vol. XXII...

-Emily Nash
Symposium Editor, IPLJ Vol. XX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the new look of the blog!  Keep up the good work, Vol. XXII&#8230;</p>
<p>-Emily Nash<br />
Symposium Editor, IPLJ Vol. XX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harvard Law Professor says Trademarking Red Unlikely by nate</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/4058/comment-page-1#comment-59892</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=4058#comment-59892</guid>
		<description>Well I guess even Harvard Law professors can be wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess even Harvard Law professors can be wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KARDASHIAN’S KOPYRIGHT KONUNDRUMS by Joseph Broseph</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/3266/comment-page-1#comment-59891</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Broseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=3266#comment-59891</guid>
		<description>Great breakdown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great breakdown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sofa Entertainment Inc. v. Dodger Productions by sandy</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/1889/comment-page-1#comment-59889</link>
		<dc:creator>sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=1889#comment-59889</guid>
		<description>Your Commentsgreat job very interesting article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Commentsgreat job very interesting article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Argh! White House Sails Into Anti-Piracy Debate by Dennis Oliver</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/3971/comment-page-1#comment-59870</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=3971#comment-59870</guid>
		<description>Your Comment
Great article; hopefully the White House&#039;s changes will be incorporated into the final bill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Comment<br />
Great article; hopefully the White House&#8217;s changes will be incorporated into the final bill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on White House Opposes [parts of] SOPA by Hey! Ho! We [The Internet] won&#8217;t go! - IPLJ</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/3960/comment-page-1#comment-59863</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey! Ho! We [The Internet] won&#8217;t go! - IPLJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=3960#comment-59863</guid>
		<description>[...] it seemed like the bill was on the fast track for approval by Congress.  But the White House criticized aspects of it over the weekend and now the Internet-wide SOPA strike is scheduled for Wednesday, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it seemed like the bill was on the fast track for approval by Congress.  But the White House criticized aspects of it over the weekend and now the Internet-wide SOPA strike is scheduled for Wednesday, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volume XXII: Book 1 by Book 1 is ready! - IPLJ</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/volumexxii/book1/comment-page-1#comment-59860</link>
		<dc:creator>Book 1 is ready! - IPLJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?page_id=3945#comment-59860</guid>
		<description>[...] can also read Book 1 here in our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can also read Book 1 here in our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FEATURE: The Sports Blawg with the Fordham Sports Law Forum by Brian</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/3622/comment-page-1#comment-59845</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=3622#comment-59845</guid>
		<description>ROLL TIDE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROLL TIDE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hotels Give TripAdvisor Low Ratings by George Lazar</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/1866/comment-page-1#comment-59841</link>
		<dc:creator>George Lazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=1866#comment-59841</guid>
		<description>Cops give out tickets for parking violations, moving violations and they arrest people who steal or commit fraud....how about  online police  who look for the  fakes and the fraudulent. 
Maybe  computer experts who are out of work could find employment as internet police. The government could  pay them minimum wage to find crooks on line and offer a substantial reward/commission as an incentive. If they knew that they would get a piece of the pie the I&#039;ll bet  the creative juices would flow.
I have a feeling that, with some good financial incentives,  computer experts could come up with ways to uncover  bad behavior and outright fraud on the internet.
I would love to see a series of  on line fines  covering &quot;misdemeanors to felonies&quot; . Maybe we could try it out for a year and see if it is cost effective....it might even produce  income for the government. If it ends up costing the taxpayer  money we can  discontinue the program.  It &#039;s worth a try .
 It would create some jobs, and give the perpetrators  something to think about before they place a fake (paid for) restaurant review, or try to defraud a senior citizen out of large amounts of money.
I am not one of those computer experts and don&#039;t know if something like this would work but it is something to consider, in my opinion. 
As a bonus, the companies who have clean records get to display &quot;The Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval&quot; !  This might cut down on the fraud  coming from outside of the country.
I would be happy to hear from any computer experts out there who have thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cops give out tickets for parking violations, moving violations and they arrest people who steal or commit fraud&#8230;.how about  online police  who look for the  fakes and the fraudulent.<br />
Maybe  computer experts who are out of work could find employment as internet police. The government could  pay them minimum wage to find crooks on line and offer a substantial reward/commission as an incentive. If they knew that they would get a piece of the pie the I&#8217;ll bet  the creative juices would flow.<br />
I have a feeling that, with some good financial incentives,  computer experts could come up with ways to uncover  bad behavior and outright fraud on the internet.<br />
I would love to see a series of  on line fines  covering &#8220;misdemeanors to felonies&#8221; . Maybe we could try it out for a year and see if it is cost effective&#8230;.it might even produce  income for the government. If it ends up costing the taxpayer  money we can  discontinue the program.  It &#8216;s worth a try .<br />
 It would create some jobs, and give the perpetrators  something to think about before they place a fake (paid for) restaurant review, or try to defraud a senior citizen out of large amounts of money.<br />
I am not one of those computer experts and don&#8217;t know if something like this would work but it is something to consider, in my opinion.<br />
As a bonus, the companies who have clean records get to display &#8220;The Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval&#8221; !  This might cut down on the fraud  coming from outside of the country.<br />
I would be happy to hear from any computer experts out there who have thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

