http://iplj.net/blog/archives/572 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal Blog Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:53:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://iplj.net/blog/archives/572/comment-page-1#comment-57515 LauraN Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:15:07 +0000 http://iplj.net/blog/?p=572#comment-57515 In China what is also "prohibited by law" is politically subversive speech, such as making copies of the Tiananmen Square photographs and distributing them. Therefore the US concern that distribution in China is prohibited because of content is not eliminated through Art. 4! In China, politically dangerous speech is "prohibited by law." China benefits from this article tremendously. In China what is also “prohibited by law” is politically subversive speech, such as making copies of the Tiananmen Square photographs and distributing them. Therefore the US concern that distribution in China is prohibited because of content is not eliminated through Art. 4! In China, politically dangerous speech is “prohibited by law.” China benefits from this article tremendously.

]]>