<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fordham International Intellectual Property Conference, Trade Panel: Trade Policy &amp; IP Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555</link>
	<description>Fordham Intellectual Property, Media &#38; Entertainment Law Journal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: property valuation auckland</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555/comment-page-1#comment-58852</link>
		<dc:creator>property valuation auckland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=555#comment-58852</guid>
		<description>We got an email the other day asking us if we&#039;d like to protect out company logo as intellectual property. What advantage is there to registering a trademage of a logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got an email the other day asking us if we&#8217;d like to protect out company logo as intellectual property. What advantage is there to registering a trademage of a logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ACTA Conspiracy &#171; Sköne Oke</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555/comment-page-1#comment-58374</link>
		<dc:creator>The ACTA Conspiracy &#171; Sköne Oke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=555#comment-58374</guid>
		<description>[...] http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555 [McCoy] When talking about comprehensive free trade agreement, IP is a trading chip. When it is an IP focused agreement, can go to government and ask them if they will be strong on it&#8230; ACTA would sell itself if we have a package of appropriate measures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555" rel="nofollow">http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555</a> [McCoy] When talking about comprehensive free trade agreement, IP is a trading chip. When it is an IP focused agreement, can go to government and ask them if they will be strong on it&#8230; ACTA would sell itself if we have a package of appropriate measures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Indian-art &#124; Fordham International Intellectual Property Conference, Trade Panel:</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/555/comment-page-1#comment-57523</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Indian-art &#124; Fordham International Intellectual Property Conference, Trade Panel:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/?p=555#comment-57523</guid>
		<description>[...] Family Guy put an intriguing blog post on Fordham International Intellectual Property Conference, Trade Panel:Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe piracy disproportionately affects the Indian artists, rather than the US ones. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Family Guy put an intriguing blog post on Fordham International Intellectual Property Conference, Trade Panel:Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe piracy disproportionately affects the Indian artists, rather than the US ones. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

