rss rss rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Submission Policy
  • Back Issue Archives
  • Editors and Staff
  • Alumni
heartattack
New York, Trademark // Oct. 04, 2012 // by Marc Castaneda // 0 Comments

The Second Avenue Deli and the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich

On September 5, 2012, the Southern District of New York concluded what is hopefully the final chapter of a trademark battle between Second Avenue Deli in Manhattan and the Heart Attack Grill in Las Vegas, Nevada.  Judge Engelmayer denied the deli’s motion to reconsider the final judgment issued July 5th, where the court ruled largely in the deli’s favor.  Engelmayer noted, “[the deli’s] expression of discontent with that outcome is nothing short of audacious.”

The denial follows a dramatic stretch of litigation over Second Avenue Deli’s Instant Heart Attack Sandwich, an indulgent confection of latkes (potato pancakes) stuffed with corned beef, pastrami, turkey, or salami.  The deli has sold and marketed the sandwich since 2004, but in recent years it has become a source of controversy.  In September of 2010, the deli filed a trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to register the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich mark.  The PTO denied the application, reasoning that consumers would likely be confused between Second Avenue Deli’s mark and that of the Heart Attack Grill, which was registered in 2005.  As a matter of federal law, trademark applications that resemble a trademark already registered with the PTO and are “likely to cause confusion” must be denied as contrary to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1052, et seq.

In March of 2010, the Heart Attack Grill sent a cease-and-desist letter to Second Avenue Deli, demanding that it refrain from using the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich mark, again citing consumer confusion as the basis for its objection.  It is worth noting that unlike the kosher deli, the Nevada grill is fashioned like a hospital, where waitresses (known as “nurses”) take orders (“prescriptions”) from the customers (“patients”) and serve dishes like the Butter-fat Shake, Flatliner Fries, and the Quadruple Bypass Burger, which at a whopping 8,000 calories, consists of four half-pound beef patties, eight slices of American cheese, a whole tomato, and half an onion served in a bun coated with lard.  Second Avenue Deli responded to this letter with a lawsuit for declaratory judgment, seeking a ruling that its sandwich does not infringe any of Heart Attack Grill’s marks and that the deli may thus register the mark.

After extensive discovery, counterclaims, and a motion for summary judgment, the court in its July 5th opinion held that Second Avenue Deli’s use of the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich mark did not violate the Lanham Act, notwithstanding the PTO finding.  The court concluded, “It is safe to say that even an unsophisticated customer could readily differentiate between a Manhattan kosher deli and its latke-based sandwich and a Las Vegas ‘medically themed’ restaurant that features gluttonous cheeseburgers.”  In its discretion, the court further issued “a concurrent use arrangement,” which permitted the deli to use its mark only within Manhattan, consistent with its current and prior use.  The court preserved Heart Attack Grill’s presumptive nationwide right to use its mark, as the senior registrant.  The court added, “In the event that future quarrels arise, the Court strongly encourages the parties to eschew provocative cease-and-desist letters or precipitous lawsuits, and instead to work together to try to resolve their differences cooperatively.”


In a stunning epilogue to this narrative, Second Avenue Deli moved the court to reconsider its ruling, arguing that its use of the mark should not be limited to Manhattan, but should rather extend to the Tri-State area.  The deli, in its moving papers, did not present any concrete plan to expand beyond its present locations in the Upper East Side and Midtown East, but was nonetheless determined to push the boundaries in the event that it should decide to expand its operations.  Judge Englemayer refused to entertain this reconsideration and stated, “[A]ny assessment as to the likelihood of confusion presented by future expansion would be unacceptably conjectural.”  The motion was denied as an improper attempt to re-litigate issues that were resolved in the July order.

While Second Avenue Deli is not permitted to use the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich name beyond the borders of Manhattan, New Yorkers can still enjoy one of these colossal delights at either of their existing locations.  In a city facing a newly approved ban on super-sized sugary drinks, there is something satisfying, at least for the voracious consumer, about preserving a staple of culinary decadence.

Written by: Marc Castaneda

 

Leave Your Response

The IPLJ Blog. Brought to you by:

Fordham University School of Law's Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal

Search by Tag

Archives

  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • April 2007

Fordham University Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal BLOG

IPLJ Editor-In-Chief:
Ryan Fox

IPLJ Managing Editor:
Tiffany Miao

IPLJ Technology & Blog Editor:
Patricia Chang

Blogroll

SDNY Rules Digital Music NOT Subject to First Sale Doctrine

Apr. 25, 2013 // 0 Comments

Judge Richard J. Sullivan granted plaintiff Capitol...

shakiradelarua

Legal Woes for Colombian Popstar Shakira Ignite

Apr. 24, 2013 // 0 Comments

Internationally known singer Shakira is facing a...

twitterbird

Hashtag Tweet About It: Twitter Finally Gets a #Patent

Apr. 20, 2013 // 0 Comments

After years of patent pending actions for...

com

The Future of “.com”

Apr. 17, 2013 // 0 Comments

Following ICANN’s 46th meeting in Beijing, the President...

EuroPatent

The European Court of Justice Dismisses Actions Against the Single European Patent

Apr. 16, 2013 // 0 Comments

In 2011, the European Council authorized enhanced...

twitter2

Hiding Behind a Hashtag: #hatespeech or #freespeech

Apr. 13, 2013 // 0 Comments

Twitter is being sued in a French...

SME_innovation

Innovation in China

Apr. 12, 2013 // 0 Comments

In this South China Morning Post article, Benjamin...

Facebook-Lawsuit

Timeline Trademark Tiff

Apr. 10, 2013 // 0 Comments

Facebook Inc. is embroiled in a legal...

hang

Apple and You: New Patent to Track Almost Everything

Apr. 04, 2013 // 0 Comments

Apple recently filed a patent for a...

facebook-login-please-re-enter-your-password

Should Your Estate Receive Access to Your Facebook Account?

Mar. 26, 2013 // 0 Comments

New Hampshire and other states are trying...

Journal Updates

yoga

Article by IPLJ’s Senior Articles Editor Published!

Apr. 23, 2013 // 0 Comments

“Stretching Copyright to its Limit,” an article...

2013-Cultural-Heritage-Law-Panel-email

Art Law Panel Discussion: April 10, 2013, 7:30PM

Apr. 04, 2013 // 0 Comments

Please join us on April 10, 2013...

jackford

“Trials of The Century: Media and the Law” with Jack Ford: March 18, 2013, 4PM

Mar. 05, 2013 // 0 Comments

We here at IPLJ invite you to...

volume

Go, Little Book!

Jan. 10, 2013 // 0 Comments

Well, maybe not so little.  We’re thrilled...

law360

IPLJ Symposium Mentioned on Law360.com!

Nov. 15, 2012 // 0 Comments

Our sincere thanks to all of those...

cite

Big week for IPLJ’s Symposium Editor!

Nov. 08, 2012 // 0 Comments

A Volume XXII note written by IPLJ’s...

IP

November 9, 2012: IPLJ Symposium

Oct. 10, 2012 // 1 Comments

Please join us on Friday, November 9,...

hollywood

Fordham Law Named One of America’s Top 10 Entertainment Law Schools!

Jul. 20, 2012 // 0 Comments

We here at IPLJ are so proud...

4

Hello, Book 4!

Jul. 02, 2012 // 0 Comments

We are so pleased to share Book...

3

Book 3 Is Complete!

Apr. 27, 2012 // 0 Comments

We here at IPLJ are so happy...

Categories

  • Apple
  • Art
  • Blogroll
  • Books
  • Broadway
  • Celebrity
  • Cell Phones
  • Censorship
  • Communications Law
  • Computers
  • Congress
  • Copyright
  • Counterfeit
  • Design
  • DMCA
  • Doh!
  • Entertainment
  • Facebook
  • Fashion
  • First Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • FSLF
  • General
  • Google
  • International IP Law
  • Internet
  • Journal Updates
  • Major League Baseball
  • Microsoft
  • Movies
  • Music
  • National Football League
  • NBA
  • NCAA
  • New York
  • News
  • Patents
  • Piracy
  • Plagiarism
  • Privacy
  • Royalties
  • Social Media
  • Sports
  • Startup
  • Surveillance
  • Technology
  • Television
  • Trade Secret
  • Trademark
  • Trolls
  • Twitter
  • United States Supreme Court
  • Video Games

Recent Posts

  • Google Death: New Feature Allows Users to Take Control of Their Digital Afterlife
  • SDNY Rules Digital Music NOT Subject to First Sale Doctrine
  • Legal Woes for Colombian Popstar Shakira Ignite
  • Will the U.S. Supreme Court Allow a Patent for a Human Gene?
  • Article by IPLJ’s Senior Articles Editor Published!

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

The IPLJ

The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal is one of the leading scholarly law journals dedicated to the publication of Articles, Essays, Comments, Addresses, and Notes on intellectual property, media, and entertainment law.

The Blog is the Journal's online counterpart. This Blog strives to present the most up-to-date intellectual property, media, sports, art, and entertainment law news and issues... and then some. We at the IPLJ find this ever-changing field fascinating and relevant. We hope you find this Blog to be the same.

  • © Copyright IPLJ / All Rights Reserved.
  • Premium WordPress Themes / Theme by wpStyles.org