rss rss rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Submission Policy
  • Back Issue Archives
  • Volume XXII Editors and Staff
  • Alumni
Linsanity
NBA, New York, Sports, Trademark // Feb. 22, 2012 // by Chrissie Cahill // 0 Comments

Linsanity TM

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past two weeks, odds are you have heard of Jeremy Lin and the Linsanity bringing Madison Square Garden to its feet.  Thanks to Lin, the Knicks have won eight of their last nine games (the Knicks face the Nets tonight).  Lin’s story is one for the books.  He was named Eastern Conference Player of the Week, after only three games, and has graced the cover of Sports Illustrated. Needless to say, the country is enthralled by the Harvard grad.  So enthralled, that it hasn’t taken long for people to capitalize on Lin.

In the two weeks since Linsanity began to sweep across the nation, three people have filed applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register the trademark “Linsanity.”  The first of these was submitted by Michael Yenchin Chang, a California businessman, who filed his application on February 7th, and has stated that he is willing to sell the trademark to Lin.  The second application was filed on February 9th by Andrew Slayton, a former volunteer coach at Palo Alto High School, Lin’s alma mater.  Slayton has been selling Lin t-shirts since he purchased the domain name, www.linsanity.com, in 2010.  Under trademark common law, Slayton would appear to have the upper hand.  Generally, the first person to use a term specifically to sell goods or services has senior trademark rights in that term.  Although Slayton filed his application after Chang, Slayton has been using the term in the sale of commerce since 2010.

Unfortunately for both of these entrepreneurs, the third person to file for a trademark was Lin himself, who filed his application on February 13th.  Pursuant to federal trademark law, if a trademarked term is associated with the name of a living person, permission is required from that person.  Furthermore, many states, including California, grant a right to publicity, aiming to protect celebrities from the commercial use of their names without their permission.  So it appears that Chang and Slayton, particularly Slayton, are on shaky ground legally, and they better watch their backs since Lin is now on the offensive.

Written by: Chrissie Cahill

 

Leave Your Response

The IPLJ Blog. Brought to you by:

Fordham University School of Law's Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal

Search by Tag

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • April 2007

Fordham University Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal BLOG

IPLJ Editor-In-Chief: Jacqueline P. McMahon

IPLJ Managing Editor: Emily Chepiga

IPLJ Technology & Blog Editor: Amy Dunayevich

................................................. Special thanks to Patricia Chang, 2L staffer, for site maintenance and graphic design.

Blogroll

blue_agave

Trademarking the agave in tequila

Apr. 27, 2012 // 0 Comments

Tequila is generally distilled within five Mexican...

dinnergarden-table-l

The phrase “a tavola” means “come to the table”

Apr. 24, 2012 // 0 Comments

Perhaps someone should have let Francis Ford...

danielbouluduse

Chef Boulud Serving Up Infringement Lawsuit

Apr. 23, 2012 // 0 Comments

Daniel Boulud, the world-renowned chef, is suing...

web-hosting

Costs to Third Parties in Battle over Online Copyright Infringement

Apr. 23, 2012 // 0 Comments

After file sharing (or “cyberlocker”) website Megaupload...

louis-vuitton-speedy-thumb-435x403-112385

No more fakes?

Apr. 18, 2012 // 0 Comments

The U.S. International Trade Commission has ruled in favor...

google oracle court smartphone

Google CEO Takes the Stand

Apr. 18, 2012 // 0 Comments

Google CEO Larry Page took the stand...

201111_eatmorekale

“Eat Mor Chikin” v. “Eat More Kale”

Apr. 18, 2012 // 0 Comments

Vermont businessman Bo Muller-Moore’s 6-year ongoing battle...

youtube_nyan_cat-580x438

Copyright Infringement Just for Embedding?

Apr. 17, 2012 // 0 Comments

Can someone infringe a copyright just by...

0405-theraflu-kanye-west-tmz-1

Have you heard the new Kanye jam?

Apr. 17, 2012 // 0 Comments

Kanye recently changed the name of his...

TrayvonMartinTShirtJustice3

Trademarks Stemming from Trayvon Martin Shooting

Apr. 17, 2012 // 0 Comments

The Trayvon Martin killing has spurred significant,...

Journal Updates

3

Book 3 is complete!

Apr. 27, 2012 // 0 Comments

We here at IPLJ are so happy...

yay

IPLJ Cited Again!

Apr. 11, 2012 // 0 Comments

Our very own Senior Articles Editor, Leah Feinman,...

4766604805_c1598fabbe

Book 2 is here!

Mar. 04, 2012 // 0 Comments

We are happy to report that Book...

Picture 212

Staffer Takes Second in NYSBA Writing Competition!

Jan. 29, 2012 // 0 Comments

IPLJ is proud to report that staffer...

supremecourtimage

Supreme Court cites IPLJ!

Jan. 19, 2012 // 0 Comments

We are so proud to report that...

number-1-sign

Book 1 is ready!

Jan. 08, 2012 // 0 Comments

In honor of the first Volume XXII...

10286-fordham_univ_law_-C

You’re Invited! Premiere IPLJ Event: IP Bullying or Proactive Enforcement?

Oct. 31, 2011 // 0 Comments

Be sure to save the date 11/11/11...

book-publishing-definitions

IPLJ’s Business Editor Published!

Oct. 25, 2011 // 1 Comments

IPLJ’s Business Editor, Amit R. Parikh, co-authored...

iplj-logo

IPLJ Alumna Writes on Fashion Law

Oct. 25, 2011 // 0 Comments

We here at IPLJ are proud to...

1038_old-skate-patent

A New Look

Sep. 14, 2011 // 2 Comments

Notice anything different around here? With the...

Categories

  • Apple
  • Art
  • Blogroll
  • Books
  • Broadway
  • Celebrity
  • Cell Phones
  • Censorship
  • Communications Law
  • Computers
  • Congress
  • Copyright
  • Counterfeit
  • Design
  • DMCA
  • Doh!
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • First Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • FSLF
  • General
  • Google
  • International IP Law
  • Internet
  • Journal Updates
  • Major League Baseball
  • Microsoft
  • Movies
  • Music
  • National Football League
  • NBA
  • NCAA
  • New York
  • News
  • Patents
  • Piracy
  • Plagiarism
  • Privacy
  • Royalties
  • Social Media
  • Sports
  • Startup
  • Surveillance
  • Technology
  • Television
  • Trade Secret
  • Trademark
  • United States Supreme Court
  • Video Games

Recent Posts

  • “Tebow-Mania” Already Rocking New York’s IP Scene
  • Government Seeks to Throw The Book at Apple and Major Publishers
  • Trademarking the agave in tequila
  • Book 3 is complete!
  • Tupac 2.0

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

The IPLJ

The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal is one of the leading scholarly law journals dedicated to the publication of Articles, Essays, Comments, Addresses, and Notes on intellectual property, media, and entertainment law.

The Blog is the Journal's online counterpart. This Blog strives to present the most up-to-date intellectual property, media, sports, art, and entertainment law news and issues... and then some. We at the IPLJ find this ever-changing field fascinating and relevant. We hope you find this Blog to be the same.

  • © Copyright IPLJ / All Rights Reserved.
  • Premium WordPress Themes / Theme by wpStyles.org