<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are relatively few non-Japanese applications filed in Japan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iplj.net/blog/archives/43/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/43</link>
	<description>Fordham Intellectual Property, Media &#38; Entertainment Law Journal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas W. Adams</title>
		<link>http://iplj.net/blog/archives/43/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas W. Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iplj.net/blog/2008/03/26/why-are-relatively-few-non-japanese-applications-filed-in-japan/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Two additional reasons for the low numbers of filings in Japan:
1. very high costs, and
2. very low likelihood of success, due to the JPO&#039;s obviousness analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two additional reasons for the low numbers of filings in Japan:<br />
1. very high costs, and<br />
2. very low likelihood of success, due to the JPO&#8217;s obviousness analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

