rss rss rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Submission Policy
  • Back Issue Archives
  • Volume XXII Editors and Staff
  • Alumni
Patents // Mar. 04, 2010 // by Deborah Wassel // 1 Comments

TiVo Wins Patent Suit

TiVo hasn’t always been profitable, but today the company stands to make a small fortune after winning its patent suit against the Dish Network Corp over technology used in its remote controls. The decision would net TiVo about $300 million from Dish (about $100 million in damages and interest, and the rest in contempt sanctions).

From the New York Times:

“At issue is a TiVo patent on technology for storing and retrieving video on DVRs, which lets viewers pause, rewind and replay live TV. TiVo sued Dish in 2004 for patent infringement for using a similar technology on its DVRs, a case Dish lost on appeal. Dish paid TiVo $104.6 million in damages and interest and was barred from using the technology.

While the case was going on, Dish crafted a redesigned technology that it said did not infringe on TiVo’s patent. But the U.S. District Court in Marshall, Texas, disagreed and ordered Dish to pay TiVo additional damages — this time at $103 million plus interest, along with about $200 million in contempt sanctions.”

In this appeal, two of the appellate judges found that the lower court “applied the right standard in analyzing whether Dish’s redesigned technology still infringed on TiVo’s patent.”  Judge Randall Rader, the lone dissenter, said the court is “punishing a company that has made a good faith effort at a redesign.”

This is the latest of several similar lawsuits; last year, TiVo sued AT&T and Verizon “over the same patent and two others that allow multiroom viewing and correct overshooting when viewers fast-forward TV.” Turning the tables, Microsoft sued TiVo in January, alleging that TiVo has violated Microsoft patents related to such things as an on-screen TV guide.

Stay tuned for further updates.

Written by: Deborah Wassel

 

One Response

Joseph Page
03.04.10

Oh boy, this is getting fun. When the big guys fight over an issue potentially reaching billions, there is considerable opportunity for lawyers to spend some time developing clever argument. I am anxious to see these results as the arrive.
Integrity Intellectual Property

Leave Your Response

The IPLJ Blog. Brought to you by:

Fordham University School of Law's Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal

Search by Tag

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • April 2007

Fordham University Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal BLOG

IPLJ Editor-In-Chief: Jacqueline P. McMahon

IPLJ Managing Editor: Emily Chepiga

IPLJ Technology & Blog Editor: Amy Dunayevich

................................................. Special thanks to Patricia Chang, 2L staffer, for site maintenance and graphic design.

Blogroll

172685

Congress Wants to Stop Your Smartphone From Knowing Too Much About You

Feb. 03, 2012 // 0 Comments

Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) has drafted legislation,...

1010309-drake-portrait-617-409

Drake sued by Ex for Royalties

Feb. 03, 2012 // 0 Comments

Whoops – looks like someone really could...

bikram

That’s so not zen: Yogis suing Yogis

Feb. 03, 2012 // 0 Comments

This blog’s tech editor started doing yoga...

HIPPA

On the heels of U.S. v. Jones

Feb. 02, 2012 // 0 Comments

CNet suggests that Congress should be following...

CIVET CAT COFFEE

Vietnam’s Counterfeit Civet Coffee

Feb. 01, 2012 // 0 Comments

“here is a growing market in fake...

ipad-art-wide-samsung-20apple-420x0

Samsung: Imitator or Innovator?

Feb. 01, 2012 // 0 Comments

The Samsung Tablet war rages on in...

123Blocks

Links as easy as…

Jan. 30, 2012 // 0 Comments

1. Investors watch Pfizer and Merck as...

Twitter-Censorship

#Censorship?

Jan. 29, 2012 // 0 Comments

This week, Twitter announced that it would...

Journal Updates

Picture 212

Staffer Takes Second in NYSBA Writing Competition!

Jan. 29, 2012 // 0 Comments

IPLJ is proud to report that staffer...

supremecourtimage

Supreme Court cites IPLJ!

Jan. 19, 2012 // 0 Comments

We are so proud to report that...

number-1-sign

Book 1 is ready!

Jan. 08, 2012 // 0 Comments

In honor of the first Volume XXII...

10286-fordham_univ_law_-C

You’re Invited! Premiere IPLJ Event: IP Bullying or Proactive Enforcement?

Oct. 31, 2011 // 0 Comments

Be sure to save the date 11/11/11...

book-publishing-definitions

IPLJ’s Business Editor Published!

Oct. 25, 2011 // 1 Comments

IPLJ’s Business Editor, Amit R. Parikh, co-authored...

iplj-logo

IPLJ Alumna Writes on Fashion Law

Oct. 25, 2011 // 0 Comments

We here at IPLJ are proud to...

1038_old-skate-patent

A New Look

Sep. 14, 2011 // 2 Comments

Notice anything different around here? With the...

linkedin

IPLJ is now on LinkedIn!

Aug. 29, 2011 // 0 Comments

Join the IPLJ group on LinkedIn, students,...

Categories

  • Apple
  • Art
  • Blogroll
  • Books
  • Broadway
  • Celebrity
  • Cell Phones
  • Censorship
  • Communications Law
  • Computers
  • Congress
  • Copyright
  • Counterfeit
  • Design
  • DMCA
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • First Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • FSLF
  • General
  • Google
  • International IP Law
  • Internet
  • Journal Updates
  • Major League Baseball
  • Microsoft
  • Movies
  • Music
  • National Football League
  • NBA
  • NCAA
  • New York
  • News
  • Patents
  • Piracy
  • Plagiarism
  • Privacy
  • Royalties
  • Social Media
  • Sports
  • Surveillance
  • Technology
  • Television
  • Trademark
  • United States Supreme Court
  • Video Games

Recent Posts

  • Congress Wants to Stop Your Smartphone From Knowing Too Much About You
  • Drake sued by Ex for Royalties
  • What’s All This About Pirates on the Internet?
  • That’s so not zen: Yogis suing Yogis
  • On the heels of U.S. v. Jones

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

The IPLJ

The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal is one of the leading scholarly law journals dedicated to the publication of Articles, Essays, Comments, Addresses, and Notes on intellectual property, media, and entertainment law.

The Blog is the Journal's online counterpart. This Blog strives to present the most up-to-date intellectual property, media, sports, art, and entertainment law news and issues... and then some. We at the IPLJ find this ever-changing field fascinating and relevant. We hope you find this Blog to be the same.

  • © Copyright IPLJ / All Rights Reserved.
  • Premium WordPress Themes / Theme by wpStyles.org